Unless you've been living under a rock during the last week, you are probably aware that the criminal sexual assault charges against Kobe Bryant were dropped by the Eagle County Colorado District Attorney's office on Wednesday, September 1, 2004. According to nearly all published reports, Bryant's accuser indicated to the DA that she was no longer willing to cooperate as a witness in the case. In my opinion, this left the DA will little choice but to dismiss the charges. While a witness can be compelled to testify, resorting to that during a jury trial in a criminal sexual assault case where a consent defense would have been a ridiculous last resort for the prosecution. I have to say that I suspected the prosecution was on its heels somewhat from the outset of the case. The first sign of trouble came when the Eagle County Sheriff's Office arrested Bryant in connection with the alleged assault without even consulting with Eagle County Colorado DA Mark Hurlbert. Law enforcement officials do not always consult with the prosecuting attorney before filing charges in cases like this, but where a high profile athlete is involved, I would say the failure to do so by the sheriff's department was ill-advised. If they case had been referred to Hurlbert first, I would like to think that Hurlbert would have questioned the victim about her sexual activities before and after her encounter with Bryant. The early discovery of such information may have kept the charges from being pursued thus saving all parties involved the stress, expense and embarassement involved with the case. Instead, once the arrest occurred, the die was cast and a series of legal manuevers by the defense (victorious motions practice resulting in the admission of evidence of the victim's sexual activities just before and after her encounter with Bryant) and some information mismanagement by the court system (posting her name on the court web site and incorrectly releasing an unredacted court transcript to a news organization) exposed the victim to even more scrutiny than a victim in such a high profile case might otherwise be expected to experience. This ulitimately led the collapse of the prosecution's case.
-Rob Hagy, Attorney and Counselor at Law
Editor, Sports and the Law Report
Recent Comments