In the case of Griffin v. Griffin, the Virginia Court of Appeals, in an unpublished opinion, reversed and remanded a trial court’s decision with regard to equitable distribution and spousal support and upheld the trial court's decision with regard to custody of the parties’ children, with regard to a divorce on ground of adultery, and with regard to an award of attorney’s fees. The key issue in the case was the fact that the equitable distribution provisions of the divorce decree entered by the court failed to comply the provisions of 20-107.3. Because it failed to do so, and because 20-107.1-the provision of the Code which deals with spousal support, requires a court to consider its equitable distribution award in making a ruling on spousal support, the trial court's decision on spousal support had to be reversed and remanded by necessity. The trial court's custody and visitation decision was correct even without direct testimony about their preference where there was ample other evidence and information given to the judge concerning the children's preference in the form of the guardian ad litem's report and recommendation. Wife proved post separation adultery as well. Wife hired a private investigator who testified about Husband's overnight stays with paramour. In addition, she supplied additional corroborating evidence from the paramour concerning overnight stays in a hotel with written documentation from the hotel stay on top of that testimony.