About

Articles and Information

Recent Posts

Disclaimer


  • The information provided on this web blog is public information and is not individualized legal advice. Do not take any legal action on any information contained in this blog!!! Always consulting with an attorney in your state about your legal issues. The presentation of information on this blog does not establish any form of attorney-client relationship with my firm or with me. While I have attempted to maintain the information on this blog as accurately as possible, this information may contain errors or omissions, for which I disclaim any liability. Case law from other jurisdictions discussed here are discussed for comparative purposes only. The author is licensed to practice only in the Commonwealth of Virginia and not in any other state. Despite the foregoing, this material could be considered to be ADVERTISING MATERIAL. The responsible party for this blog is Robert R. Hagy, II Esq., an attorney licensed to practice law in Virginia, of the Law Offices of Rob Hagy, P.C., whose address is 154 Hansen Rd., Suite 202-B, Charlottesville, Virginia 22911.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    « Charlottesville Custody and Visitation Lawyer Rob Hagy: Mother's Motion To Terminate Therapy Properly Denied. | Main | Charlottesville Custody and Visitation Lawyer Rob Hagy: Father Properly Awarded Sole Legal Custody and Mother's Visitation Properly Made Supervised. »

    October 09, 2013

    Charlottesville Divorce Lawyer Rob Hagy: Husband Improperly Converts HELOC and Joint Savings Account.

    In the case of Pliuskaitis v. Pliuskaitis, the Virginia Court of Appeals, in an unpublished opinion, ruled that the trial court properly determined that husband converted joint funds totaling $48,149.29 from a home equity line of credit and $3,000.00 from a joint savings account to personal use and not for a proper purpose.  While husband testified about how the funds were used and testified the funds were used for a proper purpose, he presented no documentation for these expenditures.  In addition, the husband's unauthorized investment of marital funds in a business venture did not constitute a proper purpose any more than his unauthorized use of such marital funds to gamble at a casino to increase the family bank account would constitute a proper purpose.

    -Rob Hagy, Charlottesville Divorce Lawyer.  For help with your property distribution questions, please email me at [email protected] or call me at (434)293-4562.

    Posted by on October 09, 2013 at 06:30 PM in Equitable Distribution, Unpublished Opinions, Virginia Court of Appeals |

    Comments

    The comments to this entry are closed.

    Categories

    Important Laws Affecting Family Law Matters

    • Virginia Code Section 20-107.3
      This provision of Virginia law governs the manner and rules for dividing martial property upon divorce.
    • Virginia Code Section 20-108.2
      This provision of Virginia law sets forth the child support guidelines-a table of reference for determining the base monthly child support obligation.
    • Virginia Code Section 20-124.3
      This statute sets forth the factors that a court will consider in divorce proceedings, temporary proceedings, or modification proceedings to determine what custody and visitation arrangement would be best for the child or children involved.

    Child Support Calculator