In the case of Harrison v. Allegretto, the Virginia Court of Appeals (in an unpublished opinion) held that the trial court did not err when it failed to apportion martial debt paid by the appellant after the parties separation when making the equitable distribution award. The Husband, who was seeking to apportion the debt to Wife, presented no documentation addressing the basis for the debts he paid or substantiating his claim that the debts were marital. He just put into evidence copies of cover letters written by him to various creditors and copies of cancelled checks made payable to the creditors. He provided no account statements from the creditors or receipts for purchases. In addition, he did not testify at the commissioner’s hearing concerning the purposes for the charges. Rather, he conclusively testified that as to the amount of marital debt after the parties separated. Furthermore, evidence was introduced that both parties had numerous credit card accounts and they transferred balances from old accounts to new accounts. Therefore, the commissioner was unable to determine the source and the nature of the debts and whether they were indeed marital debts.